Slate Stats › NFL › Studies
Is anybody actually “good in the red zone”?
Verdict — Getting there repeats. Finishing does notTwo different things hide inside the phrase. How often a player gets the ball inside the 20 repeats strongly from one half of a season to the other. How often he scores when he gets it barely repeats at all — roughly a third as strongly, measured on the same players in the same seasons.
“He is a red-zone threat” is one of the most repeated reasons to start somebody, and it bundles a real trait with a coin flip. Splitting the two apart takes one measurement, and it changes which half of the phrase is worth anything.
| Measured inside the 20 | Half a season | Corrected to a full one | Reads as |
|---|---|---|---|
| Touches and targets per game | 0.81 | 0.90 | a staff decision, and they repeat |
| Targets per game | 0.66 | 0.79 | strong |
| Touchdowns per game | 0.55 | 0.71 | volume carrying a noisy rate |
| Share of his touches scored | 0.07 | 0.14 | a coin flip |
This is the same split that runs through everything measured here. Who gets the ball is decided by a coaching staff, and staffs repeat themselves week to week. What happens next is decided on a handful of plays by a defender, a throw and a bounce, and a handful of plays is mostly noise however good the player is.
It has a practical edge. A back who took eleven carries inside the five and scored on four of them is not four-elevenths likely to score next week — but he is very likely to get the carries again, and that is the part worth paying for. Look up who is getting red-zone work rather than who converted it.
The honest caveat: red-zone conversion is not zero. At 0.29 over a full season it is weak rather than absent, and a genuinely poor finisher exists. It is simply far too noisy to read off one season, which is all anybody ever has.
How this was measured
Every pass and run from inside the opponent’s 20, 2018 through 2025, from official play-by-play, attributed to the targeted receiver or the rusher. Each player-season is split into odd and even weeks and the halves correlated across players, with a rate taken as a ratio of sums within each half rather than an average of weekly rates. The headline comparison restricts both figures to the same 808 player-seasons with six or more red-zone touches in each half, so neither number is measured on a thinner sample than the other; across every player-season with four games in each half the conversion figure is weaker still, at +0.073.